Sony’s Electronic Viewfinder FDA-EV1MK and the RX100 M2 are a Great Pair and this is why.
I got the Sony RX100 M2 as an alternative to having my Canon 5DMkIII strapped to me all the time. In between times of serious shooting I still want a camera with me (all the time) but without the strap and weight. In other words a pocketable camera. I go into why I got this camera here.
So I am happy with it…. right? Well mostly. But I have never had a camera without a viewfinder. And I was having trouble getting used to taking shots at arms length (bent arms) while looking at the LCD. In addition, the diopter adjustment on my DSLR took care of my reading glasses problem. But now for the LCD…. I have to have the glasses on when I normally do not wear them unless I am reading or on the computer. Add to that you can’t really hold the camera as steady if you don’t have it against your head.
But… a Sony EVF would fix that….
But I still wanted the pocketablility that the camera gives me. Put a EFV on it and its not pocketable any more.
A couple days ago was a very bright day and I had a problem reading the LCD. I had to use one hand to shade the screen. And I was constantly putting the LCD to my face….. Old dogs……
I called my local shop and they had a really good deal on the EVF’s.
I went down and checked it out. It actually looked smaller than I thought. And the screen was brighter with higher resolution than I was imagining. So I got it.
I spent the afternoon shooting. Here are some of my thoughts.
1. I had no problem with the bright conditions. I can shoot in any light now
2. Shots are steadier because you are resting the camera on your face. It made a big difference. I am guessing a full stop, maybe more.
3. It feels more natural with the EVF.
4. It feels like its better for composing shots. There is something about a viewfinder that makes you pay more attention to the composition
5. With or without glasses and with some diopter adjust I had no problem seeing 100%. Some have complained about this but I did not see it.
6. Some have complained about how its a slip fit on the camera with no lock. Well mine felt pretty tight. Its not going to come off unless you really knock it against something hard.
7. It is too high priced. It should only be about $200.
8. With the small eye guard on it will fit in my pocket….. But I would not do that on a regular basis.
So lets take a look at it. BTW these shot were done with my iphone and I apologize for the dust. I guess my bags need to be washed.
Here is the EVF with no eye guard. Its really pretty small like this. I thought I might work for me in this configuration. But without the eyeguard there is still an issue with bright conditions.
Here it is with the big eye cup or guard. I think it takes up too much volume and the smaller size was just fine .
So here is a side view with the dipoter slider and the smaller eye guard.
The diopter can be set for normal eyes, I set it to work without my glasses and without. Very handy. Some have complained that this slides to easily and moves. I have not seen that so far.
Here is the other side with the on manual button. I am not sure if I will use this as there is a neat little sensor in the upper left of the eye opening that senses that you are there and will turn off the LCD and turn on the EVF. And when you pull away… the LCD comes back on.
(Aghhh… cant believe the dust…. gotta stop that)
Here is what it looks like from the eye side.
I could not show you with a picture but the view in the EVF is very clear, bright, and high resolution. You can do manual focus easily with the DMF function. And I also had good luck focusing without it. Its not quite as good as the LCD in normal light conditions. BUT… in bright conditions it was great!
So here it is on the camera.
Oh… and the EVF can be rotated all the way up.
So it has the same capability as the LCD for those low shots. It will not help with over the head shots… only the LCD can do that…. but hey You have that already!
Here are some shots of the EVF in the Sony case and the case closed. Its a well made case with a cool magnetic latch. But…. its too big. Where am I supposed to put it. It would look odd in a pocket. Its much larger, I think, than it needs to be.
So how did I deal with pocketabilty. Well I already talked about how I do the camera here.
So why not do the same with the EVF when it is not in use. Here it is sitting on another smaller eyeglass bag.
And here are the EVF and the camera in their bags.
Here is my conclusion. This EVF will provide a lot of good use for me. My plan will be to have the EVF off of the camera most of the time. So EVF will be in a separate small bag in the same or different pocket. All casual shots, where there are going to be just a few shots,….will be without the EVF. Easy out of the pocket and easy back in.
If am at a location where I know I will be there a while and will be taking lots of shots…. On goes the EVF until the camera goes back into the camera.
If I am going to be at a location for a much longer time and/or I will be taking shots primarily for microstock then the DSLR comes out.
As to the price…. well. Its a great compact camera. I think its the best pocketable camera with zoom capability and a 1″ sensor!. I already spent $750… whats another $430 ( yea I got a good deal). Even $430 can be a lot of money. BUT… when you do microstock and its extra income….. Then $430 is not so bad anymore.
I think there is a chance that the images from this camera may be good enough for microstock. I think my next blog post will be on how that works out.
I was going to make this a DP Review post but …. I have enough to say I thought it was worthy of a post. So this is Why and How I took and made a Sony RX100 M2 Dust, Scratch, and Dent Protection and STILL Pocketable.
I talk a lot about why I got this camera in my previous post here. So I won’t go into that again. So I got the Sony RX100 M2 and I love it. I still love my Canon 5D Mk III but for different reasons. The Sony can do 90% of the stuff that the Canon can do but with a much smaller sensor. However that sensor is still much larger than almost all the other compacts. But enough about that.
The camera was over $740. Add in another charger, battery , and some SD memory cards and you getting close to $800. The main reason I got this is that I can slip it into my pocket and carry it ALL the time. But here is the problem. Try as hard as I can. I still will screw up and drop some coins in that same pocket…. or my set of keys….. or a pockect knife. My pocket, even when I am being careful, can be a dangerous place for a nearly $900 camera.
So the first thing I did was get some protection for the LCD screen. It came down to a couple. The Sony PCKLM15 screen protector and the Expert Screen Protector (links to both at end of post). I found that the Sony seemed to have more good reviews…. although both got good reviews. I put it on after one week. While I was putting it on…. I found a tiny scratch in the black border of the LCD screen…. And I KNOW that camera never came in contact with anything hard. Well at least I thought I knew. This is another good example of the danger zone of my supposedly empty pocket. So I put the Sony LCD protector on. It went on easy and I am happy with it.
But what about those flimsy lens blades.
I know several people, inlcuding myself, who have dented or dirtied blades like that in other digitals and caused them to freeze and not work anymore. This seems to be another weak point for my pocket danger zone.
There is a nice Sony leather form fitting case and others will likely come out. They look great but I think they would fail the pocketablity criteria of easily slipping in and out of my pocket. In addition that adjustment screw knob on the bottion will not allow you to set the camera down evenly unless you take the case off. I also looked at small camera bags but they add too much bulk to the camera and again fail in pocketability.
Then my DSLR brain kicked in. It needs a Lens CAP!!!! I measured the outside ring on the front of the camera and its about 58.13mm. So I order a cheap 58 lens cap. Well it turns out that a 58mm DSLR lens is really something larger than that. I don’t have any 58mm lenses handy but based on the 58mm cap I got… a real 58mm lens must be about 59+mm in dia. The cap fit the Sony but was too loose for my taste. So I lined the ID of the cap with a couple of circumferential strips of black electricians tape about 3mm high.
The reduced ID of the cap now fits snugly on my Sony.
But what about scratches and misc. dirt and lint on the other parts of the camera. Well I did a search on this camera and bag alternatives. I found one guy who used a soft cloth case that came with sunglasses. Turns out I have the same case. So you can see what I have here:
And here it is in the Bag.
The camera goes into and out of the bag easily. And the bag goes into and out of my pocket easily. I can put the cap back in the bag and then put the bag back in the pocket if I will be shooting for a while. AND…. the bag can even be an emergency lens cleaning cloth!!
So my $900 investment is nearly 100 % safe from the dangers of my pocket and I am carrying now every day without fear!
I needed to find out what is the best compact digital camera for a full frame DSLR Owner.
I like to consider myself a semi-pro photographer. I take images for myself and to sell on Microstock site and fine art sites. Over the past 3 years I have earned over $10,000. Not enough to live on… but enough to help buy camera stuff.
I now have the best camera equipment that you can buy……that I want and need.
But… while I don’t mind hauling around what I need for shoots for my microstock and fine art… and occasionally for family and friends. There are a lot of situations where I do like to take casual photos for my friends, family, and myself WITHOUT dragging along all the STUFF. Expensive stuff, Bulky stuff. I have to worry about where I can put it. Will somebody knock it over, or worse steal it.
So I thought wouldn’t it be great to get back to where it all started for me with point and shoots. So I can have a camera with me almost all the time and capture all those moments that get missed because I either did not have my DSLR or it was was not set up or had the wrong lens, etc.
However, since I have been shooting with a full frame for a while now. Image quality, low light performance, high frame rate, low noise are what I have come to expect from camera. I know that I cannot get all of this from a compact camera but an iPhone image is NOT going to hack it anymore.
So I asked a question in DPReview about what other full frame camera owners had in their pockets. I got a good response with over 60 answers.. and they are still coming it. So being as anal as I am…. I created a spreadsheet for each model that came up in the responses. The third column, dp c, are the dp review comments and the number of people who mentioned that they had that camera. Other things to note are…… to get a rough idea of size I multiplied the mm dimension for a cubic mm number. Between that and the weight I can tell whether the camera is really pocketable for me or not. Many were too big Several people used older entry level dslrs as their compact with a pancake lens. I grouped them together. One person even said they considered the 5DMKIII with a pancake lens is a compact…. not really.
So I rank ordered them by the number of comments. Then I color coded it. Red means not acceptable to me. Either the sensor was too small or the camera too big. Dark blue means its a strong candidate. Light blue means maybe a candidate. Note the the Canon EOS M was down graded to a light blue because, even with the firmware upgrade, the AF is still too slow compared to many of the others. Too bad because I love Canon stuff. I would love to hear back if I am wrong on that one.
Keep in mind that no one is checking all of these entries so I may have some errors. I also had to guess a bit on price. But I think the data, as I have laid it out tells a story for my purpose.
So here is the chart in pdf.
And here is a jpg of the chart.
So what do I get out of this…..
Well…. Two things. There are a few really good compacts out there but there are two types and they do two different things. One is a real compact that slides into and out of smaller pockets, has some zoom capability, and flash. The sensors can be almost up to APS-C size….well at least much larger than the typical small consumer digital compact camera. Because the sensor is larger and the lenses are a bit better, you can get some really nice images with it for a variety of situations. The other type of camera has no zoom ( unless its in a lens), interchangeable lenses, and a much bigger sensor. Most are APS-C size but some go all the way to a full frame sensor! Those images with good lenses will get you great shots that will approach what you get with a full DSLR. But with a fixed lens you better be prepared to move your butt towards or away from the image for a shot frame that you want. You could carry other lenses, for cameras that offer interchangeability, but then where do you put those extra lenses…. other pockets? Waist belt? Mini backpack?
So I think that I already have the equipment to take spectacular images, my 5D Mark II kit. Its just a little hassle carrying it and dealing with it.
For casual situations I just want good images, they don’t have to be spectacular.
And I think that is why the bulk of the responders chose the Sony RX100. If you include the newer RX100 M2 then that would be about 10 versus the next closest of the acceptable (not too large and good sized sensor) cameras, like the Fuji X100S and X100 combined for 4 comments.
So until I have the camera in my hand I can’t outright say that the Sony RX100 M2 is the best compact for full frame DSLR owners…. but I can say it looks like it would be the best choice…… for today….. 5Aug2013
The reason for this post on Micro Adjustment Auto Focus Calibration Techniques Compared is that a little over a year ago I wrote a post on Micro Adjustment Auto Focus Techniques. I have had several questions about how one compares to another. That previous post described some of the different technique but did not do a comparison for a specific set-up.
I am going to compare 5 techniques.
- Compare Images of an organized scene for various MA settings
- The Moire technique by Bart van der Wolf and explained well here
- The Lens Align System
- Focus Tune with Lens Align
- Reikans FoCal
Canon recommends that you calibrate the micro adjustment at 50X the lens size. I find that is is too impractical and others have written and I have verified that 25X works fine. So for these tests I used the 25X or about 49″.
Compare Images of an organized scene for various MA settings
This could be anything but it should be set up so that you can see the depth of field movement as you change the MA. I used a set of batteries lined up on table. The battery in the center (green) was my focus point. The others were lined up along a 45 degree line to the plane of the camera sensor at regular intervals (about 1/2″) both forward and behind the center battery.
So I focus on the center battery and take 9 shots starting at an MA of -20 then -15,-10,-5,0,5, 10,15,and finally 20. I had the camera set up in manual with a 2 second delay, ISO of 100. So here are the shots that I got with this approach.
-20 -15 -10 -5
0 5 10 15
You can click on any of these images to see a larger view. What you will see is that the sharpest green battery is between an MA of 5 and 10. I could then take some more images from MA 5 to MA 10 to narrow it down. But for this exercise I know its between 5-10 and that is pretty close.
Note that I have seen setups with rulers or printed pages with rulers usually set at 45 degrees to the camera sensor plane but you have to make sure you have a good and that your angles are all about right.
The Moire technique by Bart van der Wolf and explained well here
I this method I set up the camera 49″ from the computer screen and bring up the moire pattern that can be found on the linked site. Then in manual mode I take pictures at MA -20,-15,-10,-5,0,5,10,15, and 20. Note that in all of these techniques I cycle the focus back to infinity. Here are the results of those images.
-20 -15 -10 -5
0 5 10 15
Again, You can click on any of these images to see a larger view. What you will see is that the strongest moire effect is happening around image +5 MA. But its kind of a weak effect for me to see (unless I did something wrong). I could then take some more images from MA 5 to MA 10 to narrow it down. But for this exercise I know its close to +5. But its a weak indicator and really does not give me a good idea of the depth of the DOF and where it begins and ends. But I can see it, in a non-quantitative way in the previous example.
This system is self aligning with the target and the camera. I take the images again at the 9 different MA values. Normally what I would do is watch the target using Canons EOS Utility. But for demonstrating this comparison the photos serve a better purpose.
-20 -15 -10 -5
0 5 10 15
So this is a lot more quantitative. I can see where the DOF is and how it moves with the MA. But one problem here is that this and all the previous are relying on one image per MA. And i have found, and you will see later, that AF bounces around a bit. So if you really want to be anal about it you should have several shots for each MA. But I do not have the patience for that. Anyhow in this example the MA should be some where between 0 and 5.
Focus Tune with Lens Align
So LensAlign took out some of that tedious sampling with Focus Tune. What you do here is take shots at interval MA’s but take 3 shots for each MA and load them into their software. He is the resulting analysis.
So… somewhere between 5 and 10 on the MA.
Finally there is Reikans Focal. Again, I explained how this all worked in my previous blog. For this setup I used the 49″. And set the preferences to run a lot of points. My Canon 5D Mk III will not work on auto MA change so I have to change the MA in this example 9 times. Most everything else is automatic. Here is the result.
It says set 6 as the MA.
They all gave about the same answer. The battery set-up is FREE and if you are not anal like me it will work fine. The Moire method did not work so well. The difference was difficult to tell but it is free. The LensAlign system has the best visual clues for where you DOF is and how its changing. I think I like this the best but it fails in that you have to take a lot of samples to get the AF error averaged out. The Focus Tune is a nice addition and that will take that error out. Finally FoCal does it all and many other things like focal pt comparisons, AF repeatability, dust detection and other stuff. But you are totally relying on the software and the output graph and data. If you trust that stuff then this is the best. If not and you like to see the depth of you DOF then LensAlign with Focus Tune is the answer.
Someone suggested that I check out the AutoTune Method. Another FREE method. And I have to say this one is very clever. You should watch the video for specific instructions on how to do this. But all you need is your camera, a tripod, and a target. I used my lensalign target because it allows for me to make sure it is parallel to the camera sensor. Essentially you are setting up the camera to be fully focused on the target and then switching it to manual mode. You then cycle through the MA’s looking for the beep, red light, green dot, or whatever your camera says when you are in focus with a half depression of the shutter release button. So I set mine up at the 49 inches for my 50mm lens. Now that is 25X distance not the 50 x that this guy recommends (I will try it at 50x and see if that makes a difference). Anyhow I got an in focus reeding from MA’s that spanned -7 to +17. You pick the mid-point and …… You get 5! which is really the same as the other methods. This gets the award for the most clever, easiest and quickest but I still like to see the DOF in realtime. But… to each his own.
I will show you how to drop a DSLR Camera. I did it…. Its easy!. And then you get that sinking feel that happens immediately after the fall. Did I just turn a $3000 camera, a Canon 5D Mark III into a piece of junk. OR Even if the camera still works you KNOW that now you have a big ding on the camera and your resale value just dropped about $700 or so. Oh and lets not forget that new lens that you just got for $1500.
Turns out the damage was a big ding on the camera and the lens auto focus would no longer work. It cost me $250 to fix the lens and I know when I sell my camera in a few years I will get about $700 less or maybe I wont be able to sell it? But it works great now and my lens is fine after the fix. BTW the lens fix would have cost a lot more if I broke any of the glass components but the Hood saved that at least. I talk about hoods vs filter here.
So how did I drop it.
Well…. it’s what we used to call, in the aerospace industry, as a double fault error. All caused by operator error… that would be me.
The short of it was that I use strap with an arca clamp and a camera with an arca plate, without safety stops.
Somewhere along the line I did not tighten down the clamp and it was loose and became looser, then looser still. So I am putting on the strap with the camera after having lunch at a restaurant. And… Whoosh, bang, bang, bang. It’s an awful sound.
So here are some details of my set-up. I use a blackrapid strap RS-4. I talk about that product here. I connect that to a blackrapid FastenR Tripod (FR-T1). Actually I have the earlier version that looks like this.
That is then screwed into a Kirk 1″ arca clamp . By the way I think that Kirk makes some great stuff…. if you buy the right stuff (i.e. with safety stops). That clamp screws on to a simple little arca plate. Notice no safety pins….. Who needs safety pins or stops. Evidently I do. Check out the bottom of this page to see what the safety stops do at the Kirk site.
So this is the arca camera plate that I have now. Here is a picture of the whole set-up on my camera.
Those little pins would definitely have kept the camera from sliding out. The clamp has to be very loose to allow it to become detached from the camera plate and it would have been very noticeable, in time to re-tighten the clamp.
I know that I will get some critics that will say how can you put many thousands of dollars of camera equipment on a strap with several connection points and then a 1/4 screw into the camera. My opinion is that my set-up is very comfortable, very functional, and very light weight. Tensile strength of the materials used here are all way way higher than the weight of a camera and lens. Its only operator error, Me, that screwed it up. But now with the pins this will not happen again.
This post is about my journey to the best DSLR Camera Bag. Now of course this is a highly subjective statement. But its the best bag that I have found for my purposes. Its the LowePro Flipside Sport 15L AW.
So why is this the best DSLR Camera Bag and how did I get to that conclusion for my purposes?
Well…… It starts about 5 years ago.
I was a big point and shoot guy. I would laugh at all you DSLR idiots loaded down with your large cameras, huge lenes, filters, flashes, and tripods. I could always have a tiny camera in my pocket, ready to take a shot at any time. But then I began to notice that photographers with bigger cameras got better shots. There was more control over depth of field, richer more accurate colors, and lots of data room in each file for processing images that were not perfect to begin with.
So I got a larger prosumer or hybrid camera.
Whoops now it wont fit in my pocket any more. But at least I still did not have to carry all that other stuff. But now I have a camera that wont fit in my pocket. I did a bunch of research and came up with a bag that was well rated but did not look like a camera bag. The Crumpler 3 Million Dollar Bag.
So now I am not quite the fool that I thought the DSLR guys were but I am carrying a bag… but its a cool bag… yah!
Here is where I start doing microstock work. And the Canon 3S IS is not quite making it. I could get a few images accepted into microstock but I really needed to get a DSLR. So I get a Canon Rebel XS also known as 1000D.
Turns out the 3 Million Dollar bag fits in this camera great. I mainly used the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 lens ( a really nice lens).
But as I got more involved with Microstock I started experimenting with lenses, flash units, tripods. Then I upgraded to a Canon 50D. The 3 million crumpler was really only good enough to carry one camera and a medium size lens.
So I went crazy and bought a big Tamrac backpack. They don’t make my model anymore but it was like the current Tamrac model 5789.
The model I got had a frame, padded waist belt, vented back, an interior section that came out for storage of the equipment. I loaded it will all of my lenses, my camera, filters, flash unit, and tripod. All of my stuff fit in this bag. I hung it on a hook in my closet and would admire it every time I walked by. My admiration stopped on a hike with my daughter. I loaded up all of my stuff on a short hike up a hill to three different waterfalls. I died at the first one and had to turn back. I weighed the pack when I got home and it was 38 lbs. When I was 30 that was doable but at 60 it was a different matter. So I started paying attention to weight. The bag itself was over 5lbs!!!
I had officially become the “DSLR Idiot” that I had made fun of several years ago.
I had to find a solution. So I went into two different directions. The Black Rapid Strap RS-4. I wrote about it here. So no bags, just the camera, its lens, and a strap. In the strap are extra cards, battery, and rain cover. This covers 80% of my photo needs. But when I travel or want to have an expanded kit a strap will not suffice… So I upgraded my crumpler to a 6 million dollar bag.
Now I have the camera and a lens over my shoulder and in some cases this bag over the other. I would only load it with one or two added lenses and filters. The new 6 million dollar bag has straps on the bag for a tripod. On mine I would pull the flap over the tripod. It mostly worked but it was cumbersome. But even without the tripod I found pulling the lenses in and out of the back a little cumbersome.
So…… I got a Thinktank Retrospective 20:
This is a great bag. Its light. The internal padding is thin, light, and slick. Moving lenses in and out of the bag is easy. And the look of the bag is very professional. And with the nice wide padded strap its a very comfortable bag. Lots of extras too. I reviewed it with a video here. I still have this bag and its great. But it can get a little heavy when fully loaded. And there is no feature for a tripod so I put it on top and pull the flap cover down tight which is ok for travel but not the greatest in the field.
So I would have stayed with this bag but we recently moved to Portland, OR. Portland has got to be one of the bicycle riding capitals of the US. Everyone does it. Great bike lanes everywhere. And despite what you hear about the rain….. we have GREAT weather up here.
Hmmmm….. riding a bike with my camera stuff. Strap won’t work. Thinktank bag won’t work. I don’t want to put any of my camera equipment in the panniers. I need a backpack but not a huge one like before. But now I am smart enough, from my previous experience, I hope, to know what I really want.
1. It has to be light
3. It has to fit a least the camera and a couple lenses and my filters
4. It has to be as small as possible
5. It has to allow for easy lens replacement
6. It needs to have the ability to carry my tripod
So I did a lot of research. By the way there are easily a few hundred camera bags out there and many that come close to meeting these. But the Lowepro Flipside Sport 15L AW fit them all.
Here is a good video that shows how this bag works. Note that they are selling it as a sports camera bag and it is, but what that means to me is small and light weight while still being able to carry enough stuff:
So that’s my perfect bag now. If I go on a bike ride I put the RS-4 strap on the camera and then put all of that in the backpack. My camera will usually have a Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC lens mounted on it. Then I will also pack my Canon 70-200mm f2.8 lens for distant shots and my Sigma 70mm macro for really close work. I will also load up some graduated ND and polarizing filters. The pack is not too heavy. I can shoot from the bike. If I leave the bike I can use the strap for quick shots and then change lenses easily. Its a very comfortable and light pack. If I am in a car, train, or plane traveling then there is room for some flashes as well, my battery charger, remote shutter release, AND my tripod. Its heavy but for travel its fine.
So… ok…. I am still a little like the DSLR idiots that I made fun of but I am much cooler than when I could only make it up to that first waterfall with my 38 pound pack.
I just bought FocusTune by Michael Tapes Design!
I am a big fan of having sharp images. My Canon 5DMkIII has micro adjustment for Autofocus. So, as an ex-engineer, I love to fiddle with my camera and lenses to make sure the AF is always right on the money sharp. Of course AF systems are not totally reliable….but I can try. So I have have had Michael Tape’s Lens Align systems for years. I think I am on my third upgraded set. I wrote a blog post on how to do lens calibrations here that covered that system and others. I will have to update it with this new FocusTune system.
One of the problems I have with the Lensalign system is that you have to judge where your depth of field is on this ruler and sometimes its hard. In some cases you have to go into Photoshop and do an emboss effect to really see the focus area. But it works and in most cases you can see the focus area without this. The lensalign target also comes with an alignment system where you can be sure that the target plane and the camera sensor place are parallel.
Then along comes FoCal by Reikan. I reviewed it here. This is a nearly fully automatic system. You tether your Mac or PC to your camera. Make sure you are aligned with the target. Hit a button. Ka-ching….. Minutes later there is your best MA adjustment. One of the problems is that there is no alignment system . Maybe that is not all that important unless you are doing Macro work. Then in addition to that…. I upgraded my camera to a Canon 5D Mark III. Well the Canon camera software does not allow for automatic MA adjustment with FoCal. So you have to sit there and wait for the computer to ask you to change the MA ….. about 20 times or so. Gets old….
Now there is FocusTune by the LensAlign guys. I had to get it. So here are some of my impressions. Its Cheaper. The LensAlign is $80-160( depending on the model), the Focal Pro (this is the one to get) is about $111. The Focus Tune is $29 unless you are already a LensAlign owner and then its $19. So price is NICE!
But its a little less automatic that FoCal. Even though I have to make my own MA adjustments on the FoCal system, because of Canon, it still seems easier than the FocusTune. Here are FocusTunes steps:
1. Set up target and Camera so they are aligned (if you have the lensalign target then this is easy and gives you confidence that you are aligned) or you can use their printed target (like the FoCal system)
2. I put a set of lights on the target
3. Set up the camera. I use manual, f2.8, Single pt focus, ISO 100, IS or VC off, cover eye piece, Mirror lock up. And I set up a remote wireless shutter release.
4. Take a series of 4 shots at each MA value. I start with -20 then -10, 0, 10, 10. I rotate the focus ring to infinity between each shot.
5. Take the memory card out and feed the images to your computer.
6. Start FocusTune, and import the images
7. In the lower left of the screen zoom in till you have a good view of the target. Point to each corner of the target.
8. Hit the process and then analyze button…… Wha Lah!!! There is an estimate of your best MA an a graph.
9. You could stop there but to be precise I pick about 10-15 points around that recommendation and rerun the whole thing for a more accurate result.
So good news is its cheap. Bad news its kind of tedious. More good news is that you can turn around and check the results almost immediately by looking on the LensAlign Ruler. I think I like that the best.
Even when I do the FoCal, which is much more automated. I always get the lensalign system out and double check it.
So for the future I will likely stay with FocusTune and the Lens Align system. But…. since I am relatively lazy…. if the Reikan and Canon people can get together so that they can go back to a FULLY automatic cal on the Canon 5D MarkIII…. I may go back to FoCal.
There are many other features that the FocusTune system has like AF consistency, Focus point Comparison, Aperture Comparison, and a few others. These are good but FoCal does a better job at these and those particular tests ARE automatic on the FoCal system.
I have and friends and photographers ask me what is microstock? What kind of images do you sell? How much money can you make? And then they don’t ask but always want to know how much money have I made? So I thought I would write a blog posting about My Microstock Sales. So this is for people who are newly interested in Microstock or just starting or for microstockers just curious about what the lower 50% of microstockers are doing.
The first question about what is Microstock I answered in an earlier post here.
I have been selling microstock for about 3-4 years now. I am not a top microstock photographer. There are at least 10s of thousands of microstock photographers out there. They make anywhere from many hundreds of thousands of dollars per year down to earning nearly nothing per year. I have read that 20% of microstockers make 80% of the money.
I have about 1300 images on about 10 different sites. After 3 years I have made about $8000 total. Each year my sales have increased by 50-100%. So I am confident, that as long as I can keep submitting more images, that yearly sales will get to about $14000 in the next few years. I pick that number because above that it will affect the social security that I get ( God… that makes me feel old to say that). I submit 10-12 photos per weeks, sometimes more. I have many hundreds more ready to submit but I have found that every now and then you run across a reviewer who either does not like your style or just had a bad day and can reject most if not all of the images you submit. So with this method my worst loss is 12 images rejected.
So while I am not a real professional, I am making enough to buy most of the photo and computer equipment that I use. In a few years it will pay for photo seminars and trips. And the best part…. it never feels like work. I probably spend about 2-3 hrs a day taking photographs, or processing, or submitting them. Submitting is a little like work but the other two areas are pure fun for me.
So what microstock agencies do I work with and how have each of them paid?
So take $8000 times the approx. percentage and you can see roughly what each has paid me so far. Most of these agencies have between 800-1700 of my images. Shutterstock is the big winner for me. I get a minimum of $.36 per image. The most I have received from them is $42 for an image. I have sold 5700 images with them since I started. Most are $.36 but I also get a fair about of $2.48 and a few $28.00.
What kind of images sell best with Shutterstock?
So for example I have sold tons of the power meters and have made about $160, total, just at Shutterstock. The paddle wheel, lots of those and about $90. The others $30-$70 total. So how does that add up to thousands of dollars? Well its the other several hundred images that have sold $.36- $30. So with Shutterstock its lots and lots of images that make $10′s of dollars.
Interestingly enough istockphoto, dreamstime, veer, 123rf are similar to shutterstock in that its volume that makes total sales. But the big selling images on these sites tend to be different than the high sellers on Shutterstock. So I believe that they have a different set of customers with differing needs than Shutterstock.
I sold a few of these at Shutterstock but many more, and they are a big earner at Veer as an example.
Then there is Alamy. I think I get about 1 sale every several months. Its like Macrostock but I do sell them with a RF license. But…. when they do sell. I get a lot of money (by my standards).
I did not think that is was that great of a photo. I rate my images 1-5 stars and only submit the 3-5 stars. This was a 3 star. I got $365 for a single sale of this image?
Same situation with this 3 star image.
I got $222 for that one. Alamy is also a little frustrating in that the allow their customers to return the image for a refund many weeks after the purchase. Alamy won’t pay you till everything is cleared. So you don’t get paid for months or sometimes you will see a sale, get excited, and then weeks later its cancelled. ;-(
I submit to all of these placed because they all have different acceptance standards, different customers, and different commission. And once you process your images it is not that much work to submit them.
Can you make a good living at this? Yes…. but it would be a lot of work and commitment. In addition I think you would need a studio and some good lighting equipment and probably an assistant. I don’t do many people shots if at all. It takes my full attention doing the shots that I do. When I get people involved it just seems to complicated stuff. And its more cost. You can do general public shots but if they are recognizable you need to get a release from them. Lots of photographers do that but I would have a hard time doing that without looking like a strange old weird man.
So there you have it. If you want more info about anything let me know and I will add to this post or answer your questions.
I wrote an earlier blog on how to sell your stuff on the internet. So now I felt it was time to write about how to buy DSLR stuff. I think I have a pretty good method. I am not a pro but over the past 5 years I think I have bought and sold about $20,000 worth of camera stuff. And I have always been happy with what I have purchased. So here is my method on how to buy DSLR stuff.
What do you want ?
This is important. If you do not have this figured out there is a high likelihood that you will eventually NOT be happy with what you got.
If its a camera then you need to think about what you will be using it for. Will it only be for family and friends, for the art of it, to sell prints or images, sports, planes, flowers, insects, babies? Are you a beginner, somewhat experienced, a pro? Are you a first time DSLR buyer or are you upgrading from previous cameras. There are just too many possibilities here to offer advice for all of them. But I think the key thing is that you need to spend some time thinking about what you want to do with it.
If you are new to dslr’s and are just not sure what you want. I would suggest this. Get a basic DSLR ( like the one shown above on the left a Rebel T3). I would suggest Canon or Nikon because they are good cameras with lots of lenses to grow into. And lots of better models to buy when you know better what you want. Also, unless you are made of money. Get a used camera from a reputable seller (More on this later).
If you a more experience buyer then think about what is lacking in your current camera. Not enough AF points. Want a bigger sensor for higher quality images? Want faster frame rate? Think about that first.
Same advice for Lenses. If you are brand new I will suggest one of two things. If you want to be a purist about it. Get the basic 50mm f1.8 lens. Use your body to be your zoom. I think this will help you a lot with learning about how to frame a shot. If you are lazy, like me, get the basic zoom that is both a wide angle and telephoto like an 18-135 or 200mm
For you more experience photographers, again, think through questions like:
- What is the widest aperture that I really need?
- How far away are my subjects usually?
- What is the field of view like for the distances that I will shoot at?
- Is Sharpness really important?
- Is really good bokeh important?
- Is resale value important?
What can you afford ?
Well… only you can determine this. But here is some good news. While the really expensive cameras and lenses are usually very very good, there are some excellent cameras and lenses at affordable prices. In addition, if you buy these items used….. they are even more affordable. AND….. I have found that if you buy a used camera or lens, and the condition is good, and it comes with the original box…. And you do not ding up the hardware…. You will be able to sell it for about the same price that you bought it. How great a deal is that! I have done that many times. But here is a hint…. Keep all of your boxes, bags, wires, straps, cases, warranty cards, manuals. They are worth their weight in gold when it comes to selling items.
Also keep in mind that there are cameras in between new and used. I am referring to Refurbished by Manufacturer. I actually think this is the best type of item to get because its cheaper than new yet had just gone through a full manufacturers check and calibration. Here is the Canon Site and the Nikon Site who does this. I highly recommend this kind of buying.
So, for you beginners, you can get a basic used DSLR with a basic used Lens. A year later you have saved your money…. Sell one or both of the items. You get most of your money back and now upgrade!
I have done this starting with a Canon Rebel XS and a basic zoom lens. Four years later I have a camera (had two but sold one) and the best of every lens I need or want. I supplemented this effort with money that I earned in microstock.
How do you know whats best ?
First on camera brands, I would stick with Nikon and Canon. Why?…. I think they have the best collection of lenses and from my experience usually come out with good quality cameras. For lenses stick with your camera company’s lenses except that I have also found that Sigma and Tamron make some pretty good lenses. Ziess if you are interested in high lens quality MF lenses.
What about which model. First know what you want (see above). Next … go on the internet. My favorite site is Dpreview. This site has an excellent section on comparing different cameras (they do lenses too) here.
From these comparison pages there will usually be a link to a pretty thorough and impartial review. Other good sites are Fred Miranda, Luminous Landscape, Photo Camel, Photography on the net, and Steve’s Digicams. And there are many others. Some specialize more in lenses like Digital Picture, Photo Zone, and others.
I would also recommend that you participate in the forums of each of the sites (DPreview is my favorite). Ask a question and you will get more help than you could hope for. There are lots of friendly photographers who would love to help you.
Another idea is to join a camera club. Google your town and camera club and you are bound to find one. I have used the Meetup Groups for photography groups… There are lots. They are friendly and very welcoming to any questions that you may have.
When you narrow it down to one or two products I would suggest renting them for a day or two. You may find that the product is everything you had hoped for or you may find that it does not meet your needs at all! I have done this several times and it has convinced me to buy and sometimes to avoid buying a product.
Also keep in mind that once you buy it you can always (if you bought from the right seller) return it. Its much easier to do this at your local camera store but you can do it at the other merchants as well.
Where should you buy it ?
I have bought cameras and lenses at the local camera shop, on Craigslist, Ebay, Fred Miranda, Adorama, B&H, Abe’s, Calumet Camera, Amazon and directly from Canon. Probably the best place to buy camera is at your local camera shop if they had competitive prices. Luckily mine does. When I lived in Sacramento the most well known shop sold at prices that i would never pay. But after hunting around I found a smaller shop that priced items the same as Adorama or B&H.
- You want the best quality camera equipment that you can afford. Only buy top reviewed equipment. Or new just released stuff from high reputation companies.
- Only buy from high rated low risk sellers. For instance if I were buying on Ebay I would only buy from a seller with over 100 sales and a rating of 100%
- Make sure there is a good return policy
Local Camera Shop
This is the best place assuming they price stuff competitively and have a good reputation and a good return policy. I will always pay a little more for something, as long as its only a little mor, to be able to talk to someone face to face. I am luck here in Portland to have one of the best camera shops that I have ever seen. It’s Portland Pro Photo Supply. They have all of the items that I discussed AND they rent. I found them through Yelp. And they were highly recommended in the Photography Meetup Group that I am in. I have also found that they will have new release products as soon or before others.
I have bought some inexpensive and my most expensive purchase (Canon 300mm f2.8 lens) via Craigslist. It always makes me nervous and I tend to stay away from them unless it is a cheap or unusual item. You get to be face to face but then you never see them again and there is no rating , like in ebay, and no incentive to promote dependable returns. On the other hand it has always worked out for me. The reason I got the expensive 300mm is that I wanted the older cheaper model, and I wanted it used because it is so expensive. And I could not find it anywhere on the internet….but it was in my city on Craigslist. BTW I found out that I hate large heavy lenses so I ended up selling it on ebay and got the same price I bought it for. If you do buy on Craigslist I would reserve it for cheaper stuff or an item you can’t get anywhere else. Do the transaction at a crowded place. Check out the item well. Pay with cash.
I have bought many items on ebay. But I probably have sold many more. The nice thing is that you can get some good prices here, particularly on used items. The downside is that it is not face to face and you will not see the product until after you have paid. I have never had a problem here. The key is to only buy from sellers with at least 100 sales and a 100% good rating. There will also be a stated return policy. Read it. The seller is incentivised to keep their 100% rating so, normally, they will honor a return to avoid a bad review.
I have only used this once and it worked out fine. Its a well respected photography site with a section for people who buy and sell. There are no sales fees. There is also a rating system for sellers. I think its a little riskier than ebay or the face to face options. But the people who use this site swear buy it and my transaction, on an expensive lens, went very well.
Adormana, B&H, Abes of Main, Calumet
These are some of the big retailers. I have bought from all of them. I have used B&H the most. This is a HUGE online store and even HUGER retail store in NYC. I had the chance to go there in the past year. Its like 3-4 floors of camera and video stuff. It was packed and run by what looked to be Orthodox Jews. That is not a site you would see in Portland. If you ever get to NYC and your a photographer, then you should visit the place. I think Adorama and Calumet are similar but smaller. I know less about Abes except that they will try to sell you more than you need…. and hard sell it too. So I avoid that store. Most of these stores have a “used department” and I have purchased from them as well. Other than your local shop these guys will have some of the lowest prices and they are low risk dependable stores.
I have bought many items here as well. I would recommend only buying items that ship from Amazon. When they go to another company delayed deliveries and returns get a little complicated because Amazon is acting as a go-between. They also have competitive prices
I find the whole process of shopping, reading, researching, comparing, and talking about new camera stuff almost as much fun as buying it. If you do your homework you will get a great new lens or camera or other stuff at a great price that will give you lots of fun and satisfaction. So go buy something!!
This blog post is about this great lens that I have found, the Sigma 70mm f2.8 Macro Lens. I did a video summary of this blog here;
I covered part of my thoughts on this in my blog about How Zoom Lenses will make you Lazy. This post is sort of an extension of those ideas with more detail on the Sigma. Before I tell you about the Sigma I think it would be helpful to go through about how I ended up with this lens.
Even though I have been doing photography for 50 years ( Only the last 4 years seriously), I am still learning and some things that should be obvious are not. A good golfer will walk up to his ball and look at the lay of the course, the distance, the wind and he/she will make a decision of what golf club will best suite this situation. Its the same with photography but I don’t always guess right on the lens. For me its more trail and error.
On top of that I also needed to determine what are the kinds of shots that I, most often, like to take. And there are many many photo specialties. Protraits, macros, landscapes, motion, abstract. The list goes on. Then there are the subjects, insects, mammals, birds, flowers, architechture, planes, trains, cars, people, kids, babies and on and on and on. I think to know what you really need for a lens is based on what kind of images you like to take and what kind of subjects. In addition what context you want. Context meaning, is it all about ONLY the subject or is it about the surroundings.
So it took ME a while to figure all of this out. This is how I got there.
With point and shoots and later with the APS-C and first full frame cameras it was about having zoom capability. I did not know what I was going to see but I wanted to be prepared to take any image in any what I wanted. The zoom capability of the point and shoots and the zoom lenses on the DSLRs let me do that. I took lots of pictures. First of the places that I went, then family and friends, and finally ended up doing microstock. The quality of the images had to go up with microstock so that pushed me to own the DSLR’s . With the APS-s frame camera (Canon Rebel XS, then 50D, then 7D) my favorite lens was the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 IS. I wanted better low light performance and higher image quality so I went to full frame. The Canon 5DMkII and now the 5DMKIII. The 17-55mm is for APS-c frame cameras so I had to upgrade to Canon’s 24-70mm f2.8. I missed the IS capability but it took great shots and I have sold a lot of them on microstock sites. Recently I upgraded that lens to the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC (vibration control)
Ok…..so now 3yrs after I started seriously using DSLR’s, mostly with the 24-70mm zoom lenses, I started to figure out what kind of photography I liked to do. I also discovered that the tools (lenses) that I had were not quite getting me where I wanted to go. I discovered that I really enjoy taking pictures of fruit and vegetables at the market, flowers in flower beds or nurseries, elements of inanimate objects (trains, planes, cars, buildings, water fountains, etc). I liked if I could pick the most interesting feature of my subject and get a really sharp focus view of that. And then have the backround give the subject some context but in a soft focus manner. An example is a strawberry at the farmers market. I like taking a shot where a single strawberry or a portion of the strawberry is in perfect focus but then the background drifts off into soft focus that looks like a sea of strawberries.
But I was not getting that with my zoom lens. I was getting close but I knew that there had to be a way to do better.
I had a Canon 100mm f2.8 IS Macro. It got me close. But the field of view ended up being too small to provide a more full context than what I was looking for. I also had a 50mm f1.4 lens. But, because of minimum focus distance issues, I could not get close enough.
I keep all of my images on Aperture 3 (a great Mac program). And looked at all of my highest rated images for the most common focal distance used with the 24-70mm lens. Well it was mostly near 70mm. Hmmmmm that ought to be a clue. And I wanted to get close. Hmmmmmm close means Macro. Sharp images…… Prime?
So could there be a good quality Prime lens that takes sharp images around 70mm with macro capability and good bokeh (f2.8 or better).
Well….. I did not have to shop around. There is only one that will work with a Canon (or Nikon) the Sigma 70mm f2.8 DG Macro. And lucky for me…. its a good quality lens and not expensive ($500) at Amazon.
This lens is great. Here are the specs.
|Lens Construction||10 Elements in 9 Groups|
|Angle of View||34.3º|
|Number of Diaphragm Blades||9|
|Minimum Focusing Distance||25.7 cm / 10.1 in|
|Filter Size (mm)||62|
(Diameter x Length)
|76 x 95 mm/3.0 x 3.7 in|
|Extended Dimensions||/ 5.7 in|
|Weight||525g / 18.5oz.|
There are not a lot of reviews on it, but here are some good ones.
3. Photozone (with nice analysis)
What I can add to these reviews are my impressions.
- It looks cool. Very professionally built. Solid. Professional.
- Its very affordable at $500 versus the Canon 24-70mm at $2300
- Its takes very sharp high image quality images
- The Auto Focus gets sharp images
- Solid metal hood
- Tight manual focus ring so no problems with lens creep
- Focus stays pretty sharp in corners and no appreciable vignetting. But since my images tend to be soft focus in the corners by intent I am not sure if I am evaluating this well.
- Tight focus ring for Manual focus. Hard to move without overshooting/ undershooting focus point
- AF is slow. Fine for inanimate objects
- Odd filter attach point (put filter on hood)
Its the only lens that I have found that fits exactly what I am looking for. Its affordable at $500. And the images are tack sharp with a nice bokeh in the background. The focus ring and slow AF are not much of a problem for me. I am finding that I have much less rejects using this lens. What can I say…. Its my new walk around lens.
Here are some of the recent images that I have taken with this lens.